Legal Opinion
Floralbell Amusement Corp. v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided November 30, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMadigan, J.
A question as to coverage under a public liability insurance policy is raised by a motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency.
The policy describes the “ assured’s trade or business ” as “ motion picture and vaudeville theatre.” It covers as to “ claims and suits against the assured * * * even if groundless * * * to recover damages arising or resulting from bodily injuries and/or death accidentally suffered or alleged to have been so suffered,” by any person other than an employee of the assured, “ resulting from the ownership, care, maintenance, occupation or use ” of the assured’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Georgia Cas. Co. v. Alden MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Sontag v. GalerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Commonwealth Casualty Co. v. HeadersOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Fox Wisconsin Corp. v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Briggs Hotel Co. v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Nassau Insurance v. Mel Jo-Jo Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- Goetz v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Hanover Insurance v. 21 Mott Street Restaurant Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1978