Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Connecticut Attorneys Title Insurance Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 16, 2013No. AC 34207Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The self-represented plaintiff, Alyssa Peterson, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant Connecticut Attorneys Title Insurance Company.1 She claims that the court improperly (1) relied upon a prior judgment discharging a lis pendens placed on real property by the plaintiff and (2) determined that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the defendant committed negligence, aided and abetted fraud, *36and violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., in issuing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Martinelli v. FusiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Second National Bank of New Haven v. DyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API