Legal Opinion

City of Rochester for a Warrant To Inspect 449 Cedarwood Terrace v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2011No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

The first proceeding at issue in these appeals pertains to property at 449-451 Cedarwood Terrace in respondent City of Rochester (City). Jill Cermak is the tenant residing on the second floor of that property, and Bruce Henry is the owner. The second proceeding at issue pertains to property at 187 Clifton Street in the City, and Florine Nelson and Walter Nelson are the tenants residing in that single-family dwelling. The City requires that such rental properties have a valid certificate of occupancy (CO), which must be renewed every six years (see Rochester City Code § 90-16 [G]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Jancyn Manufacturing Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Sokolov v. Village of FreeportNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. ShireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burns v. CarballadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. BURNS, DEBORAH v. CARBALLADA, CARLOSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Burns v. CarballadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. CAPPON, CHRISTOPHER v. CARBALLADA, CARLOSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. City of Rochester for a Warrant To Inspect 187 Clifton Street v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API