Legal Opinion

United States v. Castro

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 2006No. 05-50216Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

On appeal, Juan Benito Castro (Castro) challenges his sentence, asserting that the judge’s factfinding violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

1. Judicial factfinding under an advisory Guidelines regime does not violate the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 250-52, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); see also United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1081 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Booker did not alter the preponderance of the evidence standard for factfinding set forth in United States v. Howard, 894 F.2d 1085, 1090 (9th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API