Legal Opinion

Acme Finance Co. v. Huse

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1938No. 26723. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition for Clarification.

2Per curiam

A petition has been filed in this court praying for an extensive clarification of the opinion in the above entitled case, as hereinbefore published in 192 Wash. 96, -73 P. (2d) 341, upon the ground that the opinion is likely to be so construed as to prevent the future enactment by our legislature of a small loan act of the general character now in force in a number of our sister states.

We think that this fear is unwarranted. Upon an analysis of the opinion, it will be at once realized that, while, nominally, the court had before it an act providing for the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Kelleher v. MinshullWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bryarly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Fink v. Fruitland Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API