Legal Opinion
Bryarly v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1953No. 28,970PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilkison, J.
Appellants brought this action in the Noble Circuit Court under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, §§3-1101 to 3-1116 inclusive, Burns’ 1946 Replacement, seeking to have §10-703 Burns’ 1942 Replacement declared unconstitutional.
Appellees’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and appellants refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against them, that they take nothing by their complaint, and that they pay the costs. From this judgment the appeal is taken. The assigned errors question only the ruling on the demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint alleges that each of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Brindley v. MearaIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Ass'n v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Bourbon Mini-Mart, Inc. v. Gast Fuel & Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.