Legal Opinion

Clunie v. Siebe

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1896No. S. F. No. 498PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application in the Supreme Court for writ of mandate to the assessor of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Application for a writ of mandamus. The petitioner seeks by this proceeding to compel the respondent, who is the assessor of the city and county of San Francisco, to assess the property of the Market Street Railway Company as required by sections 3648 and 3649 of the Political Code, upon the ground that said property escaped assessment and taxation for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1895, by reason of misrepresentations of the officers of said corporation as to the value of said property. It is alleged in the petition that the said corporation, on the first Monday of March, 1895, was, and…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. County of Los Angeles v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Stenocord Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Verreos v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Hellman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API