Legal Opinion

Stenocord Corp. v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1970No. S.F. 22721PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint for the recovery of taxes on its inventory and equipment. The sole question before us is whether the complaint was properly dismissed for failure to allege that plaintiff had exhausted its administrative remedies before the county board of supervisors sitting as a board of equalization. We have concluded that plaintiff had a remedy before the board, and that its failure to exhaust that remedy bars the instant action.

The complaint alleged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Parr-Richmond Industrial Corp. v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Security-First National Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. IBM Personal Pension Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Prudential Insurance of America v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API