Legal Opinion

Connor v. Greenville Nat. Exch. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1923No. 2731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The appellant assigns error upon the refusal of the court to give to the jury the following instruction:

“You are instructed that under the pleadings and evidence in the above cause no verdict can he rendered against the defendant R. E. Con-nor, and you are directed by the court to find a verdict in his favor.”

The evidence is without dispute as to the following facts: (I) That the bank renewed the $2,000 note of V. L. Connor on July 3, 1920, and again on August 2, and again on September 1, 1920; (2) that the bank did not enforce payment of the $10,600 note…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Von Brandenstein v. EbensbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Armstrong, Cator & Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alamo Lumber Co. v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Alamo Lumber Co. v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API