Legal Opinion
Connor v. Greenville Nat. Exch. Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 15, 1923No. 2731PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The appellant assigns error upon the refusal of the court to give to the jury the following instruction:
“You are instructed that under the pleadings and evidence in the above cause no verdict can he rendered against the defendant R. E. Con-nor, and you are directed by the court to find a verdict in his favor.”
The evidence is without dispute as to the following facts: (I) That the bank renewed the $2,000 note of V. L. Connor on July 3, 1920, and again on August 2, and again on September 1, 1920; (2) that the bank did not enforce payment of the $10,600 note…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Von Brandenstein v. EbensbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Armstrong, Cator & Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alamo Lumber Co. v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Alamo Lumber Co. v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 1983