Von Brandenstein v. Ebensberger
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Kendall. Tried below before the Hon. T. M. Paschal. This is an appeal from a judgment rendered upon an obligation given by appellant in consideration for the dismissal of a suit and of an attachment levied upon exempt personal property. The details and facts are given in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Acker, Judge.
Appellee brought suit in the justice’s court against the estate of Walz, deceased, of which appellant was administrator. The suit was upon an open account for two hundred and two dollars. A writ of attachment was sued out and levied upon the furniture and household goods belonging *269to the Walz estate. Walz left a widow surviving him, who was sister-in-law to appellant.. At the time the goods and furniture were seized under the attachment they were stored in a vacant house in the town of Boerne. In consideration that appellant would forbear to further prosecute his suit, and…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- People's Ice Co. v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Wortham v. Lake Jackson State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Corcanges v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Williams v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.