Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Sutherland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1932No. 27978PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, District Judge.

Replevin by General Motors Acceptance Corporation, as plaintiff, against George Sutherland, Chancellor Garage and Tire Company and Joe Chancellor, defendants, to recover possession of an automobile. Plaintiff obtained judgment against all the defendants in the county court, and again in the district court, where jury was waived and trial had to the court. Defendant Joe Chancellor appeals.

There is no dispute as to the facts. According to admissions in the pleadings, stipulated facts and evidence, on June 3, 1929, C. B. Clarke, doing business as Clarke Motor Company, sold…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railroad v. Unaka Springs Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Shaw v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Drummond Carriage Co. v. MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Small v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  5. Baughman Automobile Co. v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Champa v. Consolidated Finance Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Landis Machine Co. v. Omaha Merchants Transfer Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Fisher v. National Mortgage Loan Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Allied Investment Co. v. ShaneyfeltNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. In re Hamburger Distillery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API