Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Webb

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 26 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County to the Court of Civil Appeals and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. — M. H. Meeks, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. Justice "Williams

delivered tlie opinion of the Court.

Shaw sold an automobile to one Akers, the purchase price being represented in two notes, each of which contained a-stipulation retaining title to the machine to secure payment. The machine passed at once into the possession of the vendee. Some time thereafter it became necessary to have some repairs made on it, and the automobile was taken to Webb, a mechanic, about the date of the' maturity of the first note. After the repairs were placed the machine was turned hack by the mechanic to the conditional vendee, Akers. On default being…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Watts v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hammond v. DanielsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Drummond Carriage Co. v. MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bissell v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Knoxville Outfitting Co. v. Knoxville, Fireproof Storage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Parker-Harris Co. v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Forrest Cate Ford, Inc. v. FryarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  4. Atlas Securities Co. v. GroveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Johnson v. YatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API