Legal Opinion
Guy v. Absopure Water Company
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 8, 2023No. 2:20-cv-12734Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JUSTIN GUY, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 20-12734 v. Hon. Mark A. Goldsmith ABSOPURE WATER COMPANY Defendant. OPINION & ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 55) AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 56) Two motions are before the Court: Defendant Absopure Water Company’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 55), and Plaintiff Justin Guy’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 56). For the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. SaxonSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.