Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1932No. 29,056PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while a passenger in an automobile. There was- a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

On Sunday, April 27, 1930, the plaintiff and her daughter were on the way home from church in an automobile. Plaintiff was riding in the rear seat. Her daughter was driving. The auto belonged to the plaintiff’s husband. He was not along.

On March 2á, 1930, the defendant Mariani under a contract with the city dug a trench for sewer connections in St. Anthony avenue west of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Humphries v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Wicker v. North States Construction Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Collings v. Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Kehm v. DiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. DeVries v. City of AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Honigsberg v. New York City Transit AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API