Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Kemper Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1989No. 179 and 1023PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

These cases were consolidated before us on appeal from orders granting Appellee, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company’s, (Lumbermens) motions for summary judgment. The orders were issued based upon the trial court’s conclusion that Lumbermen did not fail to provide the required notice of cancellation of an insurance policy because a policy was never issued in this case. We affirm the trial court’s ruling, but on different grounds. We conclude that the notice provided in this case was sufficient to meet the statutory requirements.

Appellant, Stevens, completed and submitted to his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Klopp v. Keystone Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strickler v. HuffineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Rodland v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Rodland v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API