Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Belfield v. Candee

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1992No. Civ. 910154 to Civ. 910159PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Frank and David Schmidt appeal from a “Final Order Of Distribution Of Partnership Assets” entered in six separate actions and from a denial of their motion to vacate an order requiring the sale of partnership property in South Dakota. We affirm.

In 1974 Douglas Candee orally agreed with Frank and David to form Schmidt, Schmidt, and Candee (SS & C), a farming partnership. SS & C purchased land in Perkins County, South Dakota, and farmed it from 1975 through 1983. Then, Frank experienced health problems, and in 1984, Douglas and David orally agreed to form a second farming…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bakewell v. BakewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rozan v. RozanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. David v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Matter of Estate of StarcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Regstad v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Akerlind v. BuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Myers v. MyersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Thomas Ex Rel. Schmidt v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wagner v. MiskinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Thomas Richard Tarnavsky v. Morris Tarnavsky Edward TarnavskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API