Hannigan v. Technola Piano Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, J.:
For some time prior to the day of the accident decedent had been employed by the defendant as a fireman. It was his duty to report and begin work each day at four p. m. On the day of the accident he arrived at about three-twenty-five p. m., and, as *749has been the custom of defendant’s employees, went to a loading platform maintained by defendant to wait until it was time to report for work. Another employee, one Connelly, sat beside him. Large packing cases were being wheeled upon skids over this platform at the time from the building to a waiting automobile truck. The platform was not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Scholtzhauer v. . C. L. Lunch Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Matter of Di Salvio v. . Menihan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of Glatzl v. . StumppNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Morrison v. Hotel Rutledge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- D'Agostino v. WagenaarNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Claim of Dubinsky v. KofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934