Legal Opinion

Matter of Glatzl v. . Stumpp

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1917PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 2, 1916, which affirmed an award of the state industrial commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The injuries sustained by Franz Glatzl and which resulted in his death were not sustained in the course of and did not arise out of his employment as a driver. (Smith v. Price, 153 N. Y. Supp. 221; Newman v. N. & E. L. Assur.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 2, 1916, which affirmed an award of the state industrial commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The injuries sustained by Franz Glatzl and which resulted in his death were not sustained in the course of and did not arise out of his employment as a driver. (Smith v. Price, 153 N. Y. Supp. 221; Newman v. N. & E. L. Assur. Corp., 155 N. Y. Supp. 665; Gleisner v. Gross & Herbener, 155 N. Y. Supp. 946; Matter of Brown, 159 N. Y. Supp. 1047; Aylesworth v. P. C.…

1Opinion of the CourtCuddeback, J.

The state industrial commission made an award in this case to the widow and minor children of Franz Glatzl, deceased, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and the determination of the commission has been unanimously affirmed by the court at the Appellate Division.

The following are substantially the findings of the commission on the facts of the case: On November 8th, 1915, Franz Glatzl was employed by G. E. M. Stumpp who was engaged in the florist business. The duties of Glatzl were to drive a delivery wagon and if necessary to assist in delivering goods, such assistance to be rendered to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Otten v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Matter of Larsen v. . Paine Drug Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Matter of Costello v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re BettsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Claim of Gifford v. T. G. Patterson, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Matter of Dose v. . Moehle Lithographic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Claim of Mulford v. A. S. Pettit & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Rugg v. Norwich Hospital Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API