Legal Opinion
D'Agostino v. Wagenaar
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 1944PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.
The trial of the action resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen thousand dollars. *185Defendant’s counsel duly moved to set aside the verdict and dismiss the complaint, decision upon which motion was reserved.
The sole question that merits consideration to justify disturbing the verdict, and indeed, so far as I remember, the only one urged by the defendant, is whether this case is within the purview of subdivision 6 of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, which reads as follows: “ 6. The right to compensation or benefits under this chapter, shall be the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of Di Salvio v. . Menihan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of Daly v. . Bates RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Giliotti v. Hoffman Catering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maines v. Cronomer Valley Fire Dept., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Frantz v. McBee CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Mazarredo v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Helmic v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Pettaway v. McConaghyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.