Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Beijing Meishe Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. TikTok Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 2, 2025No. 3:23-cv-06012Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BEIJING MEISHE NETWORK Case No. 23-cv-06012-SI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DAUBERT MOTIONS 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 625, 627, 629, 632, 634, 636, 10 TIKTOK INC., et al., 637, 640, 642 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff filed six Daubert motions seeking to exclude expert testimony and defendants filed 14 three such motions. The Court held a hearing on these motions on August 29, 2025. The Court’s 15 determination as to each motion is detailed below. 16 17 LEGAL STANDARD 18 Federal Rule of Evidence 702 permits the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Elsayed Mukhtar v. California State University, HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API