Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Olympia Light & Power Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1905No. 5015PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Linn, J., entered October 12, 1903, dismissing on the merits an action to quiet title to water rights, upon sustaining a demurrer to the reply.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

The plaintiffs are the owners of a certain tract of land in Thurston county, containing one acre. Inasmuch as the description is by metes and bounds and the particular description not material, we will hereafter refer to it as the “one-acre tract.” The defendant is the owner of a certain four-acre tract adjoining the tract above described. For similar reasons^ we will hereafter refer to it as the “four-acre tract.” Both tracts were originally a part of the Crosby donation claim.

On the 10th day of February, 1892, A. H. Chambers and wife and Robert Frost and wife were the owners of the one^acre…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Bates v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Haley v. AmestoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Scull v. . PrudenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Abbott v. PikeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmidt v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API