United States v. Standard Aircraft Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The sole point raised upon this motion is whether the “claims for credit” and the counterclaims in the defendant’s answer are demurrable for failure to allege that the credits so set up had been presented to the Treasury officials before the answer was filed. The objection arises from R. S. § 951 (Comp. St. § 1588), and has three times been held good in District Courts (U. S. v. Patterson [C. C.] 91 F. 854; U. S. v. Cantrall [C. C.] 176 F. 949; U. S. v. Kerr [C. C.] 196 F. 503), though each time without any extended, discussion of the statute.. Except for,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WilkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- U. States v. Giles & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- United States v. CantrallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1910
- The United States, in Error v. The Heirs and Representatives of Joseph H. Hawkins, DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- United States v. KerrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Wessel, Duval & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- United States v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. HeardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1940
- United States v. Maguire Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- United States v. Marin Rock and Asphalt CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.