United States v. Marin Rock and Asphalt Company
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING HILL, District Judge.
-It is necessary to state the facts of this case rather fully before dealing with the instant motion. The facts are not in dispute. Most of the important facts are set forth in the pleadings. Some additional facts were conceded at the oral argument of the instant motion.
The Defendants in the instant action are Marin Rock and Asphalt Company, Inc. (hereinafter called “Marin”) and Robert K. Foster and Florence M. Foster (hereinafter collectively called “Foster”, or “the Fosters”). In the action the government sues as landowner for damages for trespass on its land. It…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Jeems Bayou Fishing & Hunting Club v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harold Hammond v. County of Madera, and James G. Watts, Secretary of the Interior, Real-Parties-In-Interest-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. Roy W. Williams and Carl v. IveyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Wilson v. Brand S Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Cracchiolo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985