United States v. Cantrall
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
Action by the. United States against Roscoe E. Cantrall and others. On plaintiffs’ motion to strike out portions of the answer and on demurrer to the second defense.
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the United States against Roscoe E. Cdntrall, Nanna M. Cantrall, and Cordelia D. Ankeny, on a contract made and entered into by and between the plaintiff and the defendants and one ITenry E. Ankeny, now deceased.
It appears from the complaint that on the 15th day of May, 1905, the Secretary of the Interior, by virtue of the authority conferred upon him by the national reclamation act, determined to be practicable an irrigation project in Klamath county, proposing thereby to reclaim and irrigate about 200,000 acres of land, and that at the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reeside v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- United States v. EckfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Schaumburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. PattersonU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1899
3Cited by10 opinions
- Magruder v. Belle Fourche Valley Water Users' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- United States Ex Rel. Mutual Metal Mfg. Co. v. BiggsDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1942
- United States v. PuseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. HawthorneDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
- United States v. Standard Aircraft Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.