Bingham County v. Idaho Commission for Reapportionment
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
This is the second challenge to the Idaho Commission on Reapportionment’s proposed redistricting plan. This Court previously voided the first plan on the basis that the 10.69% deviation in representation between districts, without justification, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Issues present in this case are whether the plan submitted by the Commission in response is unconstitutional under both state and federal constitutions, as well as in violation of several Idaho statutes.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mahan v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bush v. VeraSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Swann v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Twin Falls County v. Idaho Commission on RedistrictingIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Bonneville County Ex Rel. Board of Bonneville County Commissioners v. YsursaIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Manchester v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Bingham County v. Idaho Commission for ReapportionmentIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.