Legal Opinion

Sieber v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 13, 2001No. 1991706PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Helmut J. Sieber, a Canadian resident, and Canadian Agra International Corporation ("Canadian Agra"), a Canadian corporation, appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Jack L. Campbell as to claims arising out of the negotiation and performance of an employment contract. Sieber and Canadian Agra argue on appeal that the Madison Circuit Court erred by holding that they were subject to that court's personal jurisdiction under Rule 4.2, Ala.R.Civ.P., also known as this State's "long-arm statute." We disagree, and we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Facts and Procedural History

Campbell was once…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Duke v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Alabama Waterproofing Co., Inc. v. HanbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Bethel v. ThornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Sloss Industries Corporation v. EurisolCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Ex Parte McInnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Mutual Service Insurance v. Frit Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Elliott v. Van KleefSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Ex Parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API