Legal Opinion

Duke v. Young

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 1986No. 85-35PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss a third-party complaint as to six of eight third-party defendants. The motion to dismiss was granted based on lack of in personam jurisdiction. The case was appealed to this Court after an entry of final judgment pursuant to Rule 54 (b), A.R.Civ.P.

The issue is whether Alabama's long arm rule confers inpersonam jurisdiction over six non-resident directors of a Georgia corporation where the complaint alleges fraud.

For purposes of this appeal the facts as alleged by the third-party plaintiff will be considered in a light most favorable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Alabama Waterproofing Co., Inc. v. HanbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Williams v. BedenbaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Brooks v. InlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Doe v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Ex Parte McInnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Elliott v. Van KleefSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Sieber v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API