Legal Opinion
United States v. Jerry Fasolino
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 30, 1978No. 180, Docket 78-1225PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant argues that the proof of the crime of which he was convicted, corruptly endeavoring to influence the court or affect the due administration of justice, 1 was insufficient. We disagree and accordingly affirm the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, John T. Elfvin, Judge. 2
The three elements of the crime are (1) endeavoring, (2) corruptly, (3) to influence an officer of the court or the due administration of justice. Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, as we must, each of the elements was sufficiently proven.
A…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Edmund RosnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Isassi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Everett W. Thompson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. LeisureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.