Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 2010No. 07-CF-439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

After a bench trial, the Superior Court found appellant Derrick Ferrell guilty of simple assault (see D.C.Code § 22^404(a) (2001)). Ferrell appealed on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We think the evidence was sufficient, though not overwhelming (or even strong), but we need not discuss that issue. As we explain below, but for the trial court’s failure to correct the prosecutor’s misapprehension that the government required leave of court to dismiss the case — as the prosecutor told the court he wanted to do before the court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. In RE LEROY RICHARDS, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Buice v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. McClary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State of Maine v. Zachariah J. PelletierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  4. Tuckson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Workman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API