Legal Opinion

United States v. Howard

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 17, 2018No. 17-6125PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Ryan Jacob Howard entered a guilty plea on three counts of transportation of stolen property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 . During sentencing, Mr. Howard objected to the recommended restitution award for the second count, ordered under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. This appeal concerns whether the court correctly used the replacement cost as the restitution value and correctly determined the value of the returned property to be zero. We hold that it did and affirm the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual History

Between August 2015 and May 2016, Mr. Howard stole…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Francis BoccagnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Robers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. United States v. Lee Roy Mullins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Wayne BryantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MobleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Dominic Demarcus SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. SaltiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. GoodyearCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API