Robers v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
The Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 requires certain offenders to restore property lost by their victims as a result of the crime. 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. A provision in the statute says that, when return of the property lost by the victim is "impossible, impracticable, or inadequate," the offender must pay the victim "an amount equal to ... the value of the property" less "the value (as of the date the property is returned) of any part of the property that is returned." § 3663A(b)(1)(B). The question before us is whether "any part of the property" is "returned" when a victim takes title…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Dubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Conrad L. Hoever v. R. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.