Legal Opinion
In re Empire Refining Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 1, 1932No. 15041PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
Four Drillers Contracting & Supply Company, Limited, filed a petition with the referee asking leave to foreclose a chattel mortgage claimed to be held by it as a lien against the property of the bankrupt estate. The trustee objected to the allowance of the order on the ground that the chattel mortgage was void. The referee determined the *549case against the trustee, and the latter brought this proceeding to review the referee’s action.
On November 22, 1929, the bankrupt made in form a chattel mortgage in favor of Four Drillers Contracting & Supply Company, on certain of its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moore v. BaySupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Old Settlers Investment Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Gee Chong Pong v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- James Rowland, Former Director, California Department of Corrections v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Strand Restaurant Co. v. Parks Engineering Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993