Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Kennedy
In determining whether the context of a statute indicates an intent to confine a word to a meaning more narrow than the one contained in the Dictionary Act, 1 U. S. C. § 1, it seems to me permissible to ask whether the broad Dictionary Act definition is compatible with a workable construction of the statute. To the extent the Court attempts to uncover significant practical barriers to including artificial entities within 28 U. S. C. § 1915, its analysis is quite appropriate and ought not to be condemned as policymaking. The problem, in my view, is that the Court does not succeed in this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- American Soda Fountain Co. v. StolzenbachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.