Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1993No. 91-1188Published

1DissentJustice Kennedy

In determining whether the context of a statute indicates an intent to confine a word to a meaning more narrow than the one contained in the Dictionary Act, 1 U. S. C. § 1, it seems to me permissible to ask whether the broad Dictionary Act definition is compatible with a workable construction of the statute. To the extent the Court attempts to uncover significant practical barriers to including artificial entities within 28 U. S. C. § 1915, its analysis is quite appropriate and ought not to be condemned as policymaking. The problem, in my view, is that the Court does not succeed in this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. American Soda Fountain Co. v. StolzenbachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API