Legal Opinion

James Rowland, Former Director, California Department of Corrections v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1993No. 91-6646PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

506 U.S. 194

113 S.Ct. 716

121 L.Ed.2d 656

James ROWLAND, Former Director, California Department of Corrections, et al., Petitioners,

v.

CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY, UNIT II MEN'S ADVISORY COUNCIL.

No. 91-1188.

Argued Oct. 6, 1992.

Decided Jan. 12, 1993.

Syllabus *

In a suit filed in the District Court against petitioner state correctional officers, respondent, a representative association of inmates in a California prison, sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), which permits litigation without prepayment of fees, costs, or security "by a person who makes affidavit that he is…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Souter; Dissent · Kennedy; Dissent · Thomas.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. VanderVlietMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United States v. Pablo MayansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. AlzankiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. MeachamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API