Legal Opinion

Templeton v. Scruggs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 29, 1937No. 8 Div. 760PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Appellees filed a bill against appellant to cancel a mortgage on real estate, also a deed purporting to be given in lieu of foreclosure, and in the alternative, for an accounting and redemption.

Respondent filed a plea in abatement upon the ground that pending the suit complainants had parted with all interest in the lands by a conveyance to a third party.

On a submission, which the court in his decree treated “as a setting of the plea down for hearing and argument,” reciting that, “On a hearing of this character the sole question is as to the legal sufficiency of the plea as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Scharfenburg v. Town of New DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Glasser, Kuder & Ottensosser v. MeyrovitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. v. DykesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Town of New Decatur v. ScharfenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dorrough v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Edelman v. PoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Farmer v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Badham v. BadhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API