Legal Opinion
Farmer v. Hill
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 22, 1942No. 6 Div. 991PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Appellees, as mortgagees of real estate, filed their bill to enforce a right of redemption from a sale for taxes under the terms of Section 3109, Code of 1923, now Section 303, Revenue Code of 1940, also appearing as Section 303, Title 51, Code of 1940. The lands were purchased at tax sale by the State. Respondent purchased from the State. See Farmer v. Hill, 240 Ala. 416, 199 So. 820. The original bill alleged complainants are mortgagees under a mortgage executed in 1925 by R. B. Bailey and wife. By amendment these averments were stricken; and in lieu thereof it was averred…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- King v. AverySupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
- Alabama Terminal & Inprovement Co. v. Hall & FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Nelson v. First National Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Cotton v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McElrath v. Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Eatman v. NuckolsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Withers v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Park v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Patterson v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.