Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Borger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1993No. 00248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether a trial court retains discretion to reinstate the post-verdict motions of *210a defendant whose motions were dismissed after he became a fugitive, once he is returned to the jurisdiction of that court before an appeal is filed. After a careful review of precedent, we find that the trial court retains such discretion. Thus, we reverse and remand.

The facts of the present case are simple and undisputed. A jury convicted Appellant of first degree murder. Immediately thereafter, it imposed a sentence of life imprisonment. Timely…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. PassaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. ChopakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commissioner of Corrections of New York v. FullanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DeemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. BorgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. DeemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API