Commonwealth v. Borger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
In this appeal we are asked to determine whether a trial court retains discretion to reinstate the post-verdict motions of *210a defendant whose motions were dismissed after he became a fugitive, once he is returned to the jurisdiction of that court before an appeal is filed. After a careful review of precedent, we find that the trial court retains such discretion. Thus, we reverse and remand.
The facts of the present case are simple and undisputed. A jury convicted Appellant of first degree murder. Immediately thereafter, it imposed a sentence of life imprisonment. Timely…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commonwealth v. PassaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. ChopakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commissioner of Corrections of New York v. FullanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DeemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. BorgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. DeemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997