Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Deemer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1997No. 22 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

550 Pa. 290 (1997)

705 A.2d 827

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee,

v.

Martin James DEEMER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued December 12, 1996.

Decided November 21, 1997.

Leonard M. Mellon, Easton, for appellant.

John M. Morganelli, Bruce Thomas, Easton, for Com., appellee.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a trial court may properly deny a defendant's motion to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc when the defendant has willfully and purposely become a fugitive…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PassaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. DeemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. JudgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. In the Interest of J.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API