Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Deemer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1997No. 22 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a trial court may properly deny a defendant’s motion to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc when the defendant has willfully and purposely become a fugitive during proceedings before the trial court and before post-trial proceedings have begun.

Deemer was convicted of retail theft, fifth offense, on February 8, 1994. He was present for the trial, but failed to return to court when the jury announced its verdict. He also failed to appear for a scheduled post-verdict presentence investigation appointment. The court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PassaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. JudgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. In the Interest of J.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. KindlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Lawrence Lines v. David Larkins, Warden the District Attorney of the County of Bucks the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. SpencerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. JudgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. DotySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API