Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Highland Corporation

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1969No. 201PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Judge.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment entered against them in favor of plaintiff for damages allegedly sustained by reason of the negligence of defendants.

Our disposition of defendants’ first point relied upon for reversal disposes of all other points and contentions asserted by the parties.

Defendants’ position is that the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for them, and subsequently' in refusing1' to enter a judgment in their favor notwithstanding the verdict, because the evidence fails to establish that their negligence was a proximate cause of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Baca v. KahnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bolt v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Griego v. ConwellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Greenfield v. BruskasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Kitts v. Shop Rite Foods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kern Ex Rel. Kern v. St. Joseph Hospital, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Galvan v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Duran v. General Motors Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Pavlos Ex Rel. Pavlos v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Gonzales v. General Motors CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API