Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Upper Deck Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 12, 1999No. Civ. No. 96 CV-3408-B (AJB)PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

This case asks whether the practice of inserting a “chase” or “insert” card into packages of sports cards constitutes an illegal lottery or gambling. This Court has held that “as long as plaintiffs allege that they purchased packages of Upper Deck trading cards at least partially for the chance of winning a valuable chase card, then they have sufficiently alleged ‘racketeering activity1 for purposes of RICO.” Schwartz v. Upper Deck (I), 956 F.Supp. 1552, 1558 (S.D.Cal.1997). Plaintiffs move to certify…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. Clay v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1999
  3. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. Fisher v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
  5. Chavez v. Blue Sky Natural Beverage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API