Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Stenstrom v. Harnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1928PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.

The mandamus order directed the appellant, Charles A. Harnett, Commissioner of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, to permit the relator, or her attorney, to inspect all the reports in his possession regarding a certain automobile accident in which Edward S. Stenstrom was killed January 21, 1926; also to furnish transcripts of said reports on payment of the fees allowed.

As was the practice in the Bureau,the Commissioner had replied to relator’s request for leave to inspect the reports and for transcripts, asked by letter, informing her of the time, date and place of the accident; the names and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . RosenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. EmmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Egan v. Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. People v. RosenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Werfel v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Romsa v. County ClerkWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People v. Hoats, New York County Courts1980
  4. Van Allen v. McClearyNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Welde v. WolfsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API