Floaten v. Ferrell
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Greeley county. Tried below before Harrison, J. cited: Solomon v. Central Park & C. R. R., 1 Sweeney, 298. Gonzales v. JY. Y. & H. R. R., 38 N. Y., 440. Lewis v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R., 13 Am. L. Register,' 284. Morse v. Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Go., 16 N. "W. Rep., 358.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
■ The defendant in error sued the plaintiff in error in the district court of Greeley county. The cause of action, or principal one, set out in the petition, and the one upon which the contention arises, is, damage to the mare of the defendant in error, let for hire to plaintiff in error, which damage was caused by the alleged negligently driving the team, of which the said mare constituted a part, into and upon a barbed wire fence, by means of which- said mare was injured. The cause was tried to a jury, which found for the plaintiff below, and, allowing certain set-offs, assessed his damages…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Denver Consolidated Electric Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Nebraska & Iowa Ins. v. ChristiensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Trenholm v. KloepperNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Maxson v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Murphy v. GouldNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.