Apple v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by S. A. Apple and another against G. W. Pierce and others, composing the firm of Westheimer & Daube. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
WATTS, C.
On October 5, 1911, S. A. Apple and Wirt Franklin filed their petition in the dis trict court of Carter county, against G. W. Pierce, alleging that they had a legal and an equitable estate in and to the S. % of S. E. 14 of section 26 (homestead) and the N. 1/2 of N. E. 14 and N. l/2 of S. W. 1/4 of N. E. 1/4 of section 35 (surplus), all in township 3 N., range 1 E., and were entitled to immediate possession thereof; that they had been damaged in the sum of $700 by the defendants’ unlawfully withholding possession; that the defendants had unlawfully kept them out of-…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hudson v. HildtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Whitham v. LehmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Reirdon v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Apple v. Westheimer & DaubeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Darnell v. HumeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Dowell v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922