Legal Opinion

Apple v. Westheimer & Daube

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1916No. 6163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by S. A. Apple and another against West-heimer & Daube, a firm composed of Max Westheimer and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WATTS, C.

Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, sued the defendants in error, defendants below, alleging ownership and right to possession of a certain 100-acre tract of land, and damages for withholding possession from them for the year 1912. Defendants answered by general denial, .and, further, that at the time plaintiffs purchased they were in actual, exclusive, and peaceable possession under a one-year paid-up contract with allottee for the year 1911, and that they were holding for 1912, under a paid-up lease dated June 30, 1910, for five years from January 1, 1912; that by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hudson v. HildtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Chapman v. SilerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Balthrop v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Dowell v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Apple v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. S. S. & G. Mining Co. v. FullertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API