Casey v. Gibbons
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Foreclosure. Plaintiffs had judgment, from which and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial this appeal is taken on a bill of exceptions.
1. Respondents ask that the appeal from the order denying a new trial be dismissed, on the ground, among others, that the bill of exceptions does not contain copies or the substance of any of the exhibits admitted in evidence. This is nor ground for dismissal of the appeal from the order. It appears that the papers and pleadings in the matter of the estate of Timothy Brassil, deceased, were introduced and admitted in evidence,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Farmers' Natl. Gold Bank v. StoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Kohler v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Malone v. RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Leeke v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Figari v. OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Fitzgerald v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Matthews v. HintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mead v. Sanwa Bank CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Puppo v. LarosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.