Legal Opinion

Hedrick v. Washington National Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1936No. 25852. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action is based upon an accident insurance policy. The defendant denied liability, and the cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. From the judgment entered against the defendant in the sum of $2,491, it appeals.

The appellant was a corporation organized under the laws of Hlinois, and was authorized to do business in this state. Harry A. Wares was the general man ager and claim adjuster in charge of the appellant’s Seattle office,'where the policy in question was written.

October 3,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Millis v. Continental Life Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Satterfield v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Forbus v. KnightWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Weihs v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Post v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API