Legal Opinion

State v. McCard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1985No. 69425PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Prior to his trial on a charge of vehicular homicide, appellee filed a motion in limine seeking a ruling that the results of a blood-alcohol test were not admissible. This appeal is from the grant of that motion.

1. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the grant of a motion in limine, as opposed to a motion to suppress, is not directly appealable by the State under OCGA § 5-7-1. That issue is controlled adversely to appellee by State v. Strickman, 253 Ga. 287, 288 (319 SE2d 864) (1984), where, after a discussion of the function of a motion in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Perano v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. State v. StrickmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. The STATE v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Green v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BerkyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Victor Green v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API