Legal Opinion

State v. Strickman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1984No. 41179, 41180PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Justice.

We received from the Court of Appeals the following certified question:

“Although otherwise considered an interlocutory ruling, in a criminal case where the defendant’s pre-trial motion in limine to suppress evidence is granted based upon allegations not involving illegal search and seizure, is the grant of such motion in limine subject to direct appeal by the state under OCGA § 5-7-1 (4)?”

Strickman’s pre-trial motion in limine was granted, excluding evidence of the results of a breath test claimed to have been made in violation of OCGA § 40-6-392 and the regulations of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension Fund v. ChristySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Tuggle v. TuggleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. State v. ClendininCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. State v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. State v. MorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. State v. AndradeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API