Legal Opinion
State v. Strickman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 6, 1984No. 41179, 41180PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Weltner, Justice.
We received from the Court of Appeals the following certified question:
“Although otherwise considered an interlocutory ruling, in a criminal case where the defendant’s pre-trial motion in limine to suppress evidence is granted based upon allegations not involving illegal search and seizure, is the grant of such motion in limine subject to direct appeal by the state under OCGA § 5-7-1 (4)?”
Strickman’s pre-trial motion in limine was granted, excluding evidence of the results of a breath test claimed to have been made in violation of OCGA § 40-6-392 and the regulations of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension Fund v. ChristySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Tuggle v. TuggleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- State v. ClendininCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
3Cited by36 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- State v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- State v. MorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- State v. AndradeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.