Legal Opinion

State v. Frye

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1992No. A92A0783PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Chief Judge.

David Frye was indicted on a charge of robbery. At trial, after a jury was selected but before the jury was sworn, Frye moved in limine to exclude evidence of both an out-of-court identification Frye alleged was improper and any in-court identification that might be offered during trial. The trial court granted Frye’s motion and the State appeals.

1. Before considering the merits of the appeal we must consider initially the State’s right to bring a direct appeal from the trial court’s pretrial ruling on appellee’s motion in limine. See State v. Smith, 193 Ga. App. 831 (1)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gravitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. State v. StrickmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Towns v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Maddox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Terry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API